Legislation Details

File #: Int 0929-2026    Version: * Name: A plan regarding security perimeters adjacent to educational facilities.
Type: Introduction Status: Committee
Committee: Committee on Public Safety
On agenda: 6/11/2026
Enactment date: Law number:
Title: A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city of New York, in relation to a plan regarding security perimeters adjacent to educational facilities
Sponsors: Elsie Encarnación, Eric Dinowitz, Joann Ariola , Linda Lee, Lynn C. Schulman, Kamillah Hanks, Julie Menin, Christopher Marte, Chris Banks, Virginia Maloney , Nantasha M. Williams, Kevin C. Riley, Carl Wilson , Darlene Mealy, Sandra Ung, Shaun Abreu, Justin E. Sanchez, Phil Wong , Susan Zhuang, Oswald J. Feliz, James F. Gennaro, Harvey D. Epstein, Vickie Paladino, Mercedes Narcisse, Farah N. Louis, Simcha Felder, Shirley Aldebol, Ty Hankerson, Shanel Thomas-Henry , Frank Morano, David M. Carr, Inna Vernikov, Gale A. Brewer, Yusef Salaam, Shekar Krishnan, Rita C. Joseph, Selvena N. Brooks-Powers
Council Member Sponsors: 37
Summary: This bill would require the Police Commissioner to develop and implement a plan to address and contain the risk of physical obstruction, physical injury, intimidation, and interference at certain educational facilities in New York City while preserving and protecting protest rights. The plan would address these issues through the use of security perimeters at the entrances to and exits from public and nonpublic elementary, middle, and junior high schools, and nonpublic high schools. The Commissioner would be required to submit a proposed plan, no later than 45 days after the bill’s effective date, to the Mayor and the Speaker of the Council. No later than 90 days after the effective date, the Commissioner would be required to submit a final plan to the Mayor and the Speaker of the Council and post the final plan on the New York Police Department website. Lastly, the Commissioner would be required to implement the final plan no later than 120 days after the effective date.
Indexes: Report Required
Attachments: 1. Summary of Int. No. 929, 2. Int. No. 929, 3. Section 33-A Notice, 4. Committee Report 6/10/26, 5. Hearing Testimony 6/10/26, 6. June 11, 2026 - Stated Meeting Agenda
Date Ver.Prime SponsorAction ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsMultimedia
6/11/2026*Elsie Encarnación City Council Referred to Comm by Council  Action details Meeting details Not available
6/11/2026*Elsie Encarnación City Council Introduced by Council  Action details Meeting details Not available
6/10/2026*Elsie Encarnación Committee on Public Safety Hearing on P-C Item by Comm  Action details Meeting details Not available
6/10/2026*Elsie Encarnación Committee on Public Safety P-C Item Laid Over by Comm  Action details Meeting details Not available

Int. No. 929

 

By Council Members Encarnación, Dinowitz, Ariola, Lee, Schulman, Hanks, The Speaker (Council Member Menin) and Council Members Marte, Banks, Maloney, Williams, Riley, Wilson, Mealy, Ung, Abreu, J. Sanchez, Wong, Zhuang, Feliz, Gennaro, Epstein, Paladino, Narcisse, Louis, Felder, Aldebol, Hankerson, Thomas-Henry, Morano, Carr, Vernikov, Brewer, Salaam, Krishnan, Joseph and Brooks-Powers

 

A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city of New York, in relation to a plan regarding security perimeters adjacent to educational facilities

 

Be it enacted by the Council as follows:

 

Section 1. Chapter 1 of title 10 of the administrative code of the city of New York is amended by adding a new section 10-188 to read as follows:

§ 10-188 Plan regarding security perimeters adjacent to educational facilities. a. Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following terms have the following meanings:

Educational facility. The term “educational facility” means any building, structure, or place primarily used for educational programming. Such term shall be limited to: (i) public and nonpublic elementary schools, middle schools and junior high schools; and (ii) nonpublic high schools. The term shall not include colleges, universities, worker and community training facilities, museums and libraries, teaching hospitals, or educational programming that takes place in a private residence.

Interference. The term “interference” means restricting an individual’s freedom of movement.

Intimidation. The term “intimidation” means placing an individual in reasonable fear of physical harm to themselves or to another individual.

Physical obstruction.  The term “physical obstruction” means rendering ingress to or egress from an educational facility impassable, or unreasonably difficult or hazardous

b. No later than 45 days after the effective date of the local law that added this section, the police commissioner shall submit to the mayor and the speaker of the council a proposed plan to address and contain the risk of physical obstruction, physical injury, intimidation, and interference, while preserving and protecting the rights to free speech and assembly, and protest, at educational facilities through the use of security perimeters, in accordance with subdivision d, at entrances to, and exits from, such educational facilities, including parking lots or driveways of such educational facilities. For educational facilities located on private property, the entrances and exits are where a person may enter or exit the private property from the public domain, for purposes of such plan.

c. No later than 90 days after the effective date of the local law that added this section, the police commissioner shall submit to the mayor and the speaker of the council, and post on the police department’s website, a final plan.

d. The proposed and final plans shall include considerations to be used by the police department in connection with:

1. Deciding whether and when to use a security perimeter at entrances to, and exits from, an educational facility, including the duration of such a security perimeter;

2. Determining the extent of such a security perimeter, as measured from entrances to, and exits from, an educational facility;

3. Implementing such a security perimeter, including steps taken by the police department to ensure that such a perimeter neither curtails the rights to free speech and assembly, or protest nor impedes emergency access to, or egress from, an educational facility, including but not limited to access or egress by emergency personnel;

4. Engaging and communicating with administrators of an educational facility while carrying out the actions set forth in paragraphs 1 through 3 of this subdivision, in order to understand their relevant needs and concerns; and

5. Engaging and communicating with the public and individuals seeking to assemble or protest at, or to enter and exit from, educational facilities, while carrying out the actions set forth in paragraphs 1 through 3 of this subdivision, in order to understand their relevant needs and concerns.

e. In the final plan, the police commissioner shall provide to the general public a point of contact for the department regarding the final plan.

f. Nothing in this section shall be construed or interpreted to infringe upon rights granted under the national labor relations act or the labor law.

§ 2. This local law takes effect immediately.

RMC

5/20/2026