| | | | | | | | | |
Roll call
|
Not available
|
Int 1671-2019
| * | Adrienne E. Adams | | Proposed Int. No. 1671-A | Requiring the police department to report on traffic encounters. | Introduction | This bill would require the New York City Police Department to issue a quarterly report on all vehicles stops. The report would include the number of summonses issued, arrests made, vehicles seized, related use of force incidents, and vehicles searched and whether consent was provided. This information would be disaggregated by precinct, race/ethnicity, and age of the driver. | Hearing Held by Committee | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
Int 1671-2019
| * | Adrienne E. Adams | | | Requiring the police department to report on traffic encounters. | Introduction | This bill would require the New York City Police Department to issue a quarterly report on all vehicles stops. The report would include the number of summonses issued, arrests made, vehicles seized, related use of force incidents, and vehicles searched and whether consent was provided. This information would be disaggregated by precinct, race/ethnicity, and age of the driver. | Amendment Proposed by Comm | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
Int 1671-2019
| * | Adrienne E. Adams | | | Requiring the police department to report on traffic encounters. | Introduction | This bill would require the New York City Police Department to issue a quarterly report on all vehicles stops. The report would include the number of summonses issued, arrests made, vehicles seized, related use of force incidents, and vehicles searched and whether consent was provided. This information would be disaggregated by precinct, race/ethnicity, and age of the driver. | Amended by Committee | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
Int 1671-2019
| A | Adrienne E. Adams | | | Requiring the police department to report on traffic encounters. | Introduction | This bill would require the New York City Police Department to issue a quarterly report on all vehicles stops. The report would include the number of summonses issued, arrests made, vehicles seized, related use of force incidents, and vehicles searched and whether consent was provided. This information would be disaggregated by precinct, race/ethnicity, and age of the driver. | Approved by Committee | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|
Int 2220-2021
| * | Stephen T. Levin | | Proposed Int. No. 2220-A | Creating a right of security against unreasonable search and seizure, and against excessive force regardless of whether such force is used in connection with a search or seizure, that is enforceable by civil action and requiring the law department to post | Introduction | The bill would establish a local right of security against unreasonable search and seizure and against excessive force regardless of whether such force is used in connection with a search or seizure. If an NYPD employee, or a person appointed by the Police Commissioner as a special patrolman, allegedly deprives a person of this right, the person would be able to bring a civil action against the employee or appointee, as well as against the employee or appointee’s employer, within three years after deprivation of the right. The employee or appointee (or their employer) would not be allowed qualified immunity, or any substantially equivalent immunity, as a defense. The Law Department would be required to post details of these kinds of civil actions online. | Hearing Held by Committee | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
Int 2220-2021
| * | Stephen T. Levin | | | Creating a right of security against unreasonable search and seizure, and against excessive force regardless of whether such force is used in connection with a search or seizure, that is enforceable by civil action and requiring the law department to post | Introduction | The bill would establish a local right of security against unreasonable search and seizure and against excessive force regardless of whether such force is used in connection with a search or seizure. If an NYPD employee, or a person appointed by the Police Commissioner as a special patrolman, allegedly deprives a person of this right, the person would be able to bring a civil action against the employee or appointee, as well as against the employee or appointee’s employer, within three years after deprivation of the right. The employee or appointee (or their employer) would not be allowed qualified immunity, or any substantially equivalent immunity, as a defense. The Law Department would be required to post details of these kinds of civil actions online. | Amendment Proposed by Comm | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
Int 2220-2021
| * | Stephen T. Levin | | | Creating a right of security against unreasonable search and seizure, and against excessive force regardless of whether such force is used in connection with a search or seizure, that is enforceable by civil action and requiring the law department to post | Introduction | The bill would establish a local right of security against unreasonable search and seizure and against excessive force regardless of whether such force is used in connection with a search or seizure. If an NYPD employee, or a person appointed by the Police Commissioner as a special patrolman, allegedly deprives a person of this right, the person would be able to bring a civil action against the employee or appointee, as well as against the employee or appointee’s employer, within three years after deprivation of the right. The employee or appointee (or their employer) would not be allowed qualified immunity, or any substantially equivalent immunity, as a defense. The Law Department would be required to post details of these kinds of civil actions online. | Amended by Committee | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
Int 2220-2021
| A | Stephen T. Levin | | | Creating a right of security against unreasonable search and seizure, and against excessive force regardless of whether such force is used in connection with a search or seizure, that is enforceable by civil action and requiring the law department to post | Introduction | The bill would establish a local right of security against unreasonable search and seizure and against excessive force regardless of whether such force is used in connection with a search or seizure. If an NYPD employee, or a person appointed by the Police Commissioner as a special patrolman, allegedly deprives a person of this right, the person would be able to bring a civil action against the employee or appointee, as well as against the employee or appointee’s employer, within three years after deprivation of the right. The employee or appointee (or their employer) would not be allowed qualified immunity, or any substantially equivalent immunity, as a defense. The Law Department would be required to post details of these kinds of civil actions online. | Approved by Committee | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|
Res 1538-2021
| * | Laurie A. Cumbo | | Proposed Res. No. 1538-A | Remove the NYC Police Commissioner’s exclusive authority over police discipline. (S5252/A6012) | Resolution | | Hearing Held by Committee | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
Res 1538-2021
| * | Laurie A. Cumbo | | | Remove the NYC Police Commissioner’s exclusive authority over police discipline. (S5252/A6012) | Resolution | | Amendment Proposed by Comm | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
Res 1538-2021
| * | Laurie A. Cumbo | | | Remove the NYC Police Commissioner’s exclusive authority over police discipline. (S5252/A6012) | Resolution | | Amended by Committee | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
Res 1538-2021
| A | Laurie A. Cumbo | | | Remove the NYC Police Commissioner’s exclusive authority over police discipline. (S5252/A6012) | Resolution | | Approved by Committee | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|
Res 1547-2021
| * | Francisco P. Moya | | | Require NYPD officers to live within the five boroughs of NYC. (S2984/A1951) | Resolution | | Hearing Held by Committee | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
Res 1547-2021
| * | Francisco P. Moya | | | Require NYPD officers to live within the five boroughs of NYC. (S2984/A1951) | Resolution | | Approved by Committee | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|
Res 1584-2021
| * | By the Committee on Public Safety | | Preconsidered | Adopting a plan pursuant to State Executive Order Number 203. | Resolution | | Hearing on P-C Item by Comm | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
Res 1584-2021
| * | By the Committee on Public Safety | | | Adopting a plan pursuant to State Executive Order Number 203. | Resolution | | P-C Item Approved by Comm | Pass |
Action details
|
Not available
|