|
| | | | | | | | | |
Roll call
|
Not available
|
|
T2024-2628
| * | | | | Oversight - The Use of Automated Decision Systems and Artificial Intelligence by New York City Agencies. | Oversight | | Hearing Held by Committee | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
|
T2024-2628
| * | | | | Oversight - The Use of Automated Decision Systems and Artificial Intelligence by New York City Agencies. | Oversight | | Filed, by Committee | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
|
Int 0199-2024
| * | Jennifer Gutiérrez | | | Establishing an office of algorithmic accountability. | Introduction | This bill would establish an office of algorithmic accountability. The office would be responsible for working with city agencies to promote transparency and accountability, by analyzing algorithmic tools used by city agencies, conducting pre-deployment assessments of the risks associated with the intended use of algorithmic tools; creating a public-facing platform that provides a mechanism for the submission of comments and questions by the public about a specific algorithmic tool used by an agency; establishing a protocol for receiving complaints from members of the public about the city’s use of algorithmic tools; and conducting corrective action related to the city’s use of an algorithmic tool. The bill would also require the office to report to the council and the mayor a summary of the results of such assessments of algorithmic tools used by City agencies. | Hearing Held by Committee | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
|
Int 0199-2024
| * | Jennifer Gutiérrez | | | Establishing an office of algorithmic accountability. | Introduction | This bill would establish an office of algorithmic accountability. The office would be responsible for working with city agencies to promote transparency and accountability, by analyzing algorithmic tools used by city agencies, conducting pre-deployment assessments of the risks associated with the intended use of algorithmic tools; creating a public-facing platform that provides a mechanism for the submission of comments and questions by the public about a specific algorithmic tool used by an agency; establishing a protocol for receiving complaints from members of the public about the city’s use of algorithmic tools; and conducting corrective action related to the city’s use of an algorithmic tool. The bill would also require the office to report to the council and the mayor a summary of the results of such assessments of algorithmic tools used by City agencies. | Laid Over by Committee | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
|
Int 0926-2024
| * | Julie Menin | | | Establishing basic compliance standards for the use of artificial intelligence by city agencies. | Introduction | This bill would require the office of algorithmic accountability to promulgate rules establishing basic compliance standards that all agencies must meet when developing, procuring, deploying, and using public-impacting artificial intelligence. These standards would be reviewed annually. | Hearing Held by Committee | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
|
Int 0926-2024
| * | Julie Menin | | | Establishing basic compliance standards for the use of artificial intelligence by city agencies. | Introduction | This bill would require the office of algorithmic accountability to promulgate rules establishing basic compliance standards that all agencies must meet when developing, procuring, deploying, and using public-impacting artificial intelligence. These standards would be reviewed annually. | Laid Over by Committee | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
|
Int 1024-2024
| * | Jennifer Gutiérrez | | | Requiring a list of artificial intelligence systems that have been assessed by the office of algorithmic accountability. | Introduction | This bill would require the office of algorithmic accountability to make publicly available on the city’s website a list of all artificial intelligence systems for which it has conducted a pre-deployment assessment. The list would be required to be updated annually. | Hearing Held by Committee | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
|
Int 1024-2024
| * | Jennifer Gutiérrez | | | Requiring a list of artificial intelligence systems that have been assessed by the office of algorithmic accountability. | Introduction | This bill would require the office of algorithmic accountability to make publicly available on the city’s website a list of all artificial intelligence systems for which it has conducted a pre-deployment assessment. The list would be required to be updated annually. | Laid Over by Committee | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
|
Int 1099-2024
| * | Keith Powers | | | Requiring reporting on the impact of algorithmic tools on city employees and changes in employment responsibilities due to algorithmic tools. | Introduction | This bill would add to the annual algorithmic tools compliance report to require agencies to report on the impacts of algorithmic tools on city employees and employment responsibilities. Specifically it would require the city to report on the number of employees whose employment status have been impacted by the use of such tool; including the number funded agency positions eliminated due to the use of such tool, the number of funded agency positions for which there was any displacement, the number of salaries changed due to changes in responsibility due to use of such tool, and the number of city employees who were required to undertake any new trainings due to the use of an algorithmic tool. | Hearing Held by Committee | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
|
Int 1099-2024
| * | Keith Powers | | | Requiring reporting on the impact of algorithmic tools on city employees and changes in employment responsibilities due to algorithmic tools. | Introduction | This bill would add to the annual algorithmic tools compliance report to require agencies to report on the impacts of algorithmic tools on city employees and employment responsibilities. Specifically it would require the city to report on the number of employees whose employment status have been impacted by the use of such tool; including the number funded agency positions eliminated due to the use of such tool, the number of funded agency positions for which there was any displacement, the number of salaries changed due to changes in responsibility due to use of such tool, and the number of city employees who were required to undertake any new trainings due to the use of an algorithmic tool. | Laid Over by Committee | |
Action details
|
Not available
|