THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK RESOLUTION NO. 1226 Title Resolution approving the decision of the City Planning Commission on ULURP No. C 990170 PPQ, for the disposition of one (1) city-owned property generally located on the block bounded by 59th Avenue, 94th Street, the northerly boundary line of a park strip adjacent to the Long Island Expressway, and 92nd Street (Block 1875, Lot 1), Queens, (L.U. No. 666). Body By Council Members Eisland and Linares WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission filed with the Council on January 24, 2000 its decision dated January 19, 2000 (the "Decision") on the application submitted pursuant to Section 197-c of the New York City Charter by the Department of Citywide Administrative Services, for the disposition of one (1) city-owned property generally located on the block bounded by 59th Avenue, 94th Street, the northerly boundary line of a park strip adjacent to the Long Island Expressway, and 92nd Street (Block 1875, Lot 1), pursuant to zoning, Borough of Queens (ULURP No. C 990170 PPQ) (the "Application"); WHEREAS, the Application is related to ULURP Application numbers C 990171 ZSQ (L.U. No. 667), grant of a special permit pursuant to Section 74-743(a)(3) of the Zoning Resolution for modification of height and setback regulations; and C 990172 ZSQ (L.U. No. 668), grant of a special permit pursuant to Section 74-512 of the Zoning Resolution; WHEREAS, the Decision is subject to review and action by the Council pursuant to Section 197-d(b)(3) of the City Charter; WHEREAS, upon due notice, the Council held a public hearing on the Decision and Application on February 16, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the land use implications and other policy issues relating to the Decision and Application; WHEREAS, the Council has considered the relevant environmental issues and the Final Environmental Impact Statement ("FEIS") for which a Notice of Completion was issued on January 5, 2000 (CEQR No. 98DME009Q); RESOLVED: Having considered the FEIS, with respect to the Application, the Council finds that: (1) the FEIS meets the requirements of 6 N.Y.C.R.R. Part 617; ___________ Page 2 of 2 C 990170 PPQ Reso. No. 1226 (L.U. No. 666) (2) consistent with social, economic and other essential considerations, from among the reasonable alternatives, the proposed action is the one which minimizes or avoids adverse environmental effects to the maximum extent practicable, including the effects disclosed in the FEIS; and (3) consistent with social, economic and other essential considerations, to the maximum extent practicable, adverse environmental effects revealed in the environmental impart statement will be minimized or avoided by incorporating as conditions to the approval those mitigative measures which were identified as practicable; and The Decision and the FEIS constitute the written statement of facts, and of social, economic and other factors and standards that form the basis of this determination, pursuant to 6 N.Y.C.R.R. ?617.9(c)(3). The Council finds that the action described herein will have no significant effect on the environment; and Pursuant to Section 197-d of the City Charter and on the basis of the Application and the Decision, the Council approves the Decision. Adopted. Office of the City Clerk, } The City of New York, } ss.: I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a Resolution passed by The Council of The City of New York on February 29, 2000, on file in this office. ............................................ City Clerk, Clerk of Council