THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK
RESOLUTION NO. 244

Title
Resolution approving the decision of the City Planning Commission on ULURP No. C 060059 MMX, an amendment to the City Map (L.U. No. 81).
Body

By Council Members Katz and Garodnick

WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission filed with the Council on February 27, 2006 its decision dated February 22, 2006 (the "Decision"), on the application submitted by the Department of Parks and Recreation, pursuant to Sections 197-c and 199 of the New York City Charter and Section 5-430 et seq. of the New York City Administrative Code, for an amendment to the City Map involving: the elimination, discontinuance and closing of portions of Jerome Avenue between East 164th Street and Macombs Dam Bridge Approach, Macombs Dam Bridge Approach between Jerome Avenue and East 161st Street, and East 161st Street between Macombs Dam Bridge Approach and River Avenue; the establishment of a park addition within an area bounded by East 161st Street, River Avenue, East 164th Street, Jerome Avenue and Macombs Dam Bridge Approach; the adjustment of grades necessitated thereby; and any acquisition or disposition of real property related thereto, in Community District 4, Borough of the Bronx, in accordance with Map No. 13112 dated September 22, 2005 and signed by the Borough President (ULURP No. C 060059 MMX) (the "Application");

WHEREAS, the Application is related to ULURP Applications Numbers C 060056 MMX (L.U. No. 78), an amendment to the City Map establishing a new park on the site of the existing Yankee Stadium between East 161st Street, East 157th Street, and River Avenue including former Ruppert Place; C 060057 MMX (L.U. No. 79), an amendment to the City Map establishing a new park along the Harlem River waterfront from slip 2 through slip 4 at the site of the former Bronx Terminal Market; C 060058 MMX (L.U. No. 80), an amendment to the City Map establishing a new park on two city-owned parcels located at River Avenue and East 157th Street; C 060144 PQX (L.U. No. 82), an acquisition of interest in the stadium property; C 060145 PPX (L.U. No. 83), a disposition of city-owned property; C 060146 PPX (L.U. No. 84), a disposition of city-owned property; C 060147 PPX (L.U. No. 85), a disposition of city-owned property; C 060148 (A) MCX (L.U. No. 86), a major concession to allow for operation of a new tennis facility on a waterfront parkland; C 060149 ZSX (L.U. No. 87), a special permit for a public parking garage with a maximum of 949 spaces; C 060150 ZSX (L.U. No. 88), a special permit to waive a required rear yard in a proposed public parking garage;

______
WHEREAS, the Decision is subject to review and action by the Council pursuant to Section 197-d(b)(1) of the City Charter;

WHEREAS, upon due notice, the Council held a public hearing on the Decision and Application on March 28, 2006;

WHEREAS, the Council has considered the land use implications and other policy issues relating to the Decision and Application; and

WHEREAS, the Council has considered the relevant environmental issues and the Final Environmental Impact Statement (“FEIS”) for which a Notice of Completion of the FEIS was issued on February 10, 2006. The FEIS included an alternative, the Alternative Park Plan, which reflects the modified ULURP Application (C 060148(A) MCX) that was submitted subsequent to the issuance of the DEIS.

The Notice of Completion for the FEIS identified significant adverse impacts and proposed mitigation measures with respect to the Proposed Action and the Alternative Park Plan adopted are summarized in the FEIS Executive Summary attached as Exhibit A to the Report of the City Planning Commission approving ULURP Application No. C 060059 MMX (CEQR No. 05DPR006X) and such summary is incorporated by reference herein;

RESOLVED:

Having considered the FEIS, with respect to the Application, the Council finds that:

(1) The FEIS meets the requirements of 6 N.Y.C.R.R. Part 617;

From among the reasonable alternatives thereto, the Alternative Park Plan set forth in the FEIS is the one which minimizes or avoids adverse environmental impacts to the maximum extent practicable; and

The adverse environmental impacts revealed in the FEIS with respect to the Alternative Park Plan will be minimized or avoided to the maximum extent practicable by incorporating as conditions to the approval those mitigative measures that were identified as practicable;

The Decision and the FEIS constitute the written statement of facts, and of social, economic and other factors and standards that form the basis of the decision, pursuant to 6 N.Y.C.R.R. §617.11(d).

_______

Pursuant to Sections 197-d and 199 of the New York City Charter, the Council approves the Decision.


Adopted.


Office of the City Clerk, }
The City of New York, } ss.:

I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a Resolution passed by The Council of The City of New York on April 5, 2006, on file in this office.





…..............................................
City Clerk, Clerk of The Council